David Cameron yesterday changed his plans to reduce state spending.

The Tory leader said he would tackle the deficit immediately but said cuts did not have to be ‘ particularly extensive’ at first.

His comments suggest a lighter approach to public finances after warnings of a possible double dip recession.

Chancellor Alistair Darling has warned that if cuts re made too quickly, deficit reduction could delay economic recovery.

Speaking at a lunch with business leaders, Mr Cameron said:

“Plans that don’t start now are not particularly meaningful. I think you have to see some early action, and early action doesn’t have to be particularly extensive, it just has to be early, and it has got to be action.”

Mr Cameron has promised to tackle the record £178 billion budget deficit following the release this week of weaker-than-expected growth figures.

In a speech at the World Economic Forum in the Swiss ski resort of Davos, the Tory leader said:

“Our reputation rests on rejecting the course of inaction and the path of least resistance.

“Instead we must be bold enough to make the right judgment – however difficult that may be – to ensure the long-health of our economy and restore Britain’s reputation on the world stage.

‘The stark truth is that today, Britain’s reputation is at risk. To deal with this we need to make sure people can look at our budget deficit without worrying about our creditworthiness.”

Conservative sources denied that Mr Cameron going back on his pledge to cut spending.

 Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman Vince Cable  and Treasury chief secretary Liam Byrne have both criticised Cameron for changing his plans, but Vince Cable, said:

“The Tories’ confused statements about cuts show that they don’t really know what to do about the economy.

“In their desperation to sound tough on public spending, the Tories didn’t take economic reality into account.

“It is of course necessary to cut public spending but this must be done when the economy is strong enough to cope.

“The economy remains dependent on artificial money creation and a Government running a massive deficit, but with growth of just 0.1%, immediately slashing government spending would be disastrous.”